M 311                                           Spring 2004
                                                                                
                HOMEWORK SUMMARY REPORT
                                                                                
                                                                                
Chapter number: 6
                                                                                
Section number: 2
                                                                                
Exercise number: 8
                                                                                
Number of papers received: 4
                                                                                
Reviewing committee: Eta
                                                                                
List all participating committee members:
    ..., Amanda Coots
                                                                                
Author(s) of paper(s) chosen for publication:   [Zach Olson]
                                                                                
                                                                                
                                                                                
Comments: [A] and [B]'s papers were both completely correct, but we
felt that the overall solution would benefit from a joint revision.  In
essence, we would like to see the conciseness of [B]'s paper combined
with the clear, written-out examples of [A]'s paper.
                                                                                
Of the other two papers submitted, one was correct [but not typed], and
the other did not appear to be completely correct.
                                           
GRADER'S COMMENT:  In fact, all the papers except Zach's had logical 
errors.

INSTRUCTOR'S COMMENT:  I recommend looking at the old paper in the Web 
solutions.