M 311 Spring 2004 HOMEWORK SUMMARY REPORT Chapter number: 7 Section number: 1 Exercise number: 11 Number of papers received: 2 Reviewing committee: Iota List all participating committee members: Kathryn Nicole Clark, Author(s) of paper(s) chosen for publication: Chris Glaser Comments: Both papers correctly answered the problem, but I found Chris Glasers' to be much easier to understand and follow. One thing I liked in both papers was the use of example matrices to demonstrate the pattern; this was especially helpful because both used matrices that gave determinants of the same magnitude, and this further helped to show that the pattern lay in the sign of the determinant. I did not see any errors in either paper, and thought both authors did a good job. GRADER'S COMMENT: Proving things just with examples is prone to error. The theorem can be proved in general by counting the number of row and column interchanges needed to put the numbers into the familiar order.